The Loyal Opposition & The Practice of Aikido


  • Jonathan Miller-Lane Middlebury College



Discussions regarding martial arts often focus on the unique manner in which different styles respond to a set of common attacks. Indeed, it is in these unique responses that most martial arts distinguish themselves. However, this paper examines the role of the aggressor during training; specifically, in the martial art of Aikido and draws an analogy between the role of an aggressor during Aikido practice and the actions of a member of the loyal opposition in a democracy. A commitment to a set of rules that govern and protect the participants and a commitment to maintain a rich, creative tension mark both the vibrant interactions of an Aikido dojo and democratic life in a multicultural society.


Download data is not yet available.

Métricas alternativas


FOORD, A. (1964). His majesty’s opposition, 1714-1830. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

KING, M. (1963). Why we can’t wait. New York: Mentor.

SAOTOME, M. (1993). Aikido and the harmony of nature. Boston: Shambhala Publications.

STEVENS, J. (1987). Abundant peace: The biography of Morehei Ueshiba, founder of Aikido. Boston: Shambhala Publications.

WILKIE, W. (1940, November 11). Loyal opposition’s constructive criticism. National Radio Address. Acceso 15 de septiembre de 2005



How to Cite

Miller-Lane, J. (2012). The Loyal Opposition & The Practice of Aikido. Revista de Artes Marciales Asiáticas, 2(2), 64–81.