From phenomenology to a theory of corporal combat and martial arts


  • Cristiano Barreira University of São Paulo



Phenomenology, martial arts, combat sports


FAPESP, grant number 2019/11527-6


This work aims to propose, based on previous phenomenological outcomes, a Theory of Corporal Combat Phenomenon (TCCP) and to anticipate directions for the propositions of a Theory of Martial Arts Phenomenon. Although theories concerning Martial Arts (MA) aren’t uncommon, there is not one based on phenomenological analysis. Previous theories concern natural assumptions about values and conceptions of what MA is, or even deconstruct the phenomena. Guided by Edmund Husserl's philosophy, outcomes about combat experiences analyzed by bracketing natural knowledge allow us to grasp the inner structural intentionality that, in all varieties of manifestations, gives into existence the Martial Arts. A significant essential approaching of corporal combat has been made by Figueiredo (2009), who conceptualizes Combat Sport by having the body as target and means of the actions. But not all Corporal Combat manifestations analyzed to return “to the things themselves” -  Physical Brawl, Fighting, Playing of fighting, Duel, Self-defence and Instrumental Offensive Combat - are MA&CS (Barreira, 2017). Findings are simplified and presented as a theory fostering not only a more accessible apprehension but the visualization of new investigative problems focused on Martial Arts practitioners’ experiences in different contexts. The TCCP leads to the conclusion that corporal fighting experience is central to MA manifestations as practices involving complex phenomena such as teaching, learning, training and fighting practices in community contexts. Future descriptions on how martial arts practitioners’ development occurs when experiencing different Corporal Combat help to develop a Theory of MA Phenomenon.


Download data is not yet available.

Métricas alternativas


International Hopology Society’. (s.f.). Retrieved from

Barreira, C.R.A. (2017). The essences of martial arts and corporal fighting: a classical phenomenological analysis. Archives of Budo, 13, 351-376.

Basetti, V., Telles, T., & Barreira, C. (2016). Toward a psychology of Jiu-jitsu: phenomenological analysis of the ways to combat in practitioner's experience. Revista de Artes Marciales Asiáticas, 11(2s), 86-87. doi:

Bowman, P. (2017). The Definition of Martial Arts Studies. Martial Arts Studies, 3, 6-23. doi:

Cynarsky, W. J. (2019). Martial Arts & Combat Sports: towards the general theory of fighting arts. Gdansk: Katedra.

Figueiredo A. (2009). The object of study in martial arts and combat sports research—Contributions to a complex whole. In W.J. Cynarski (Ed.), Martial Arts and Combat Sports — Humanistic Outlook (pp. 20-34). Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego.

Harrison, L. J. (2011). On theory and martial arts. The Journal Of Alternative Perspectives On The Martial Arts And Sciences, 11(1), 32-38.

Henning, S. (2007). La Doncella de Yue: fuente de la teoría de las artes marciales chinas. Revista de Artes Marciales Asiáticas, 2(4), 40-53. doi:

Husserl, E. (1996). Natural scientific psychology, human sciences and metaphysics. In T. Nenon & L. Embree (Eds.), Issues in Husserl’s Ideas II (pp. 8-13). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Melo, F. & Barreira, C. R. A. (2015). Psychological barriers between violence, fight and game: phenomenological transitions in the practice of capoeira. Movimento, 21(1), 125-138.

Tokitsu, K. (1979). La voie du karaté: pour une théorie des arts martiaux japonais. Paris: Seuil.

Tokitsu, K. (2000). Budô: Le ki et le sens du combat. Méolans-Revel: DésIris.

Vey, G. (2010). Combate integrador: una perspectiva empírica de las artes marciales. Revista de Artes Marciales Asiáticas, 5(2), 7-20. doi:

Wetzler, S. (2015). Martial Arts Studies as Kulturwissenschaft: A Possible Theoretical Framework. Martial Arts Studies, 1, 20-33. doi:




How to Cite

Barreira, C. (2019). From phenomenology to a theory of corporal combat and martial arts. Revista de Artes Marciales Asiáticas, 14(2s), 64–67.