Herramientas para el control de la empresa por parte del accionista: los códigos de buen gobierno e internet
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18002/pec.v0i6.698Palavras-chave:
Códigos de buen gobierno, Internet, Control, Accionistas, Gobierno corporativo electrónico, Codes of good governance, Shareholders, Electronic corporate governanceResumo
La globalización de la economia y los escándalos financieros en algunas empresas han hecho que la información sobre el funcionamiento y gobierno de las empresas sea un asunto critico para la confianza en éstas y para el buen funcionamiento del mercado de capitales.La información sobre las empresas, no sólo reduce los riesgos sobre las inversiones, sino que reduce las asimetrías de información e incrementa la transparencia de la empresa frente a accionistas e inversores.Los códigos de buen gobierno y la legislación emanada de estos códigos han impuesto grandes requerimientos de información a las empresas frente a los accionistas, principalmente sobre los órganos y prácticas de gobierno de las empresas, actuando de esta forma como sistemas de control del problema de agencia que desarrollan la transparencia, vigilan el valor de la empresa y reducen los costes de agencia. En este trabajo se va a analizar si los códigos de buen gobierno han contribuido a velar por los intereses de los accionistas; cómo lo están haciendo y proponer un modelo de desarrollo de gobierno electrónico que permita la verificación de las recomendaciones de buen gobierno y la participación en la vida social a los accionistas.The globalization of the economy and the financial scandals at some companies have made the information on the performance and corporate governance are a critical issues for the trust in them and for the proper functioning of the capital market.The information on enterprises, not only reduces the risk on investments, but it reduces the information asymmetries and increases the transparency of the company for shareholders and investors.The codes of good governance and legislation emanating from these codes have imposed reporting requirements on large companies versus shareholders, primarily on organs and practices of corporate governance, thus acting as control systems to the problem of agency developing transparency, monitoring the value of the business and reduce the cost of agency.This paper will analyze whether the codes of good governance have contributed to look after the interests of shareholders, as we are doing and propose a model for development of e-government to permit verification of the recommendations of good governance and participation in social life to shareholders
Downloads
Referências
AITKEN, M.; C. HOOPER and J. PICKERING (1997) "Determinants of Voluntary Disclosure of Segment Information: A Re-examination of the Role of Diversification Strategy", Accounting & Finance, 37 (1), pp. 89-109.
ALBA, C.; A. ZUBILLAGA y N. RUIZ (2003) "Educación Superior y discapacidad: Accesibilidad de las páginas Web de las universidades estatales", Comunicación y Pedagogía, 188, pp. 25-30.
ALONSO ALMEIDA, M.M. (2007) El gobierno corporativo electrónico. Análisis desde el enfoque de confianza. Madrid: Editorial Visión Libros.
ANG, J.S.; R.A. COLE and J. WUH LIN (2000) "Agency Cost and Ownership Structure", Journal of Finance, 55 (1), pp. 81-106.
AZOFRA, V.; P. de ANDRÉS, F. LÓPEZ y J.M. RODRÍGUEZ (1998) "The Effects of
Alternative Financial System Models on Corporate Governance". J. FALZON and E. GARDENER (eds.) Strategic challenges in European banking. Paris: MacMillan.
BABÍO ARCAY, R. and M.F. MUÍÑO VÁZQUEZ (2000) "Compliance with the Olivencia Code: Changes Observed in Spanish Companies Disclosure Policy". Comunicación presentada al 23 Congreso Anual de la EAA, Munich. Alemania.
BARCLAY, D.W. and J.B. SMITH (1997) "The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships", Journal of Marketing, 61 (1), pp. 3–22.
BEASLEY, M.S. (1996) "An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Directors Composition and Financial Statement Fraud", The Accounting Review, 71 (4), pp. 443-465.
BECKER, C.L.; M.L. DEFONT, J. JIAMBALVO and K.R. SUBRAMANYAM (1998) "The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management", Contemporary Accounting Research, 15, pp. 1-24.
BETCHT, M. (2000) "Srong Blockholders, Weak Owners and the need for European Mandatory Disclosure". En European Corporate Governance Network. The separation of Ownership and Control: A Survey of seven European Countries. Preliminary Report to the European Commission. Bruselas.
BRADBURY, M.E.; Y.T. MAK and S.M. TAN (2002) "Board Characteristics, Audit Committee Characteristics and Abnormal Accruals", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33 (3), pp. 375-400.
CHEN, C.J.P. and B. JAGGI (2000) "Association Between Independent non- executive Directors, Family Control and Financial Disclosures in Hong Kong", Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19, pp. 285-310.
CHEN, C.R. and T.L. STEINER (1999) "Managerial Ownership and Agency Conflicts: A Nonlinear Simultaneous Equation Analysis of Managerial Ownership, Risk Taking, Debt Policy and Dividend Policy", Financial Review, 34, pp. 119-136.
CHO, M.H. (1998) "Ownership Structure, Investment and the Corporate Value: An Empirical Analysis", Journal of Financial Economics, 47, pp. 103- 121.
COLES, J.W.; V.B. MCWILLIANS and N. SEN (2001) "An Examination of the Relationship of Governance Mechanisms to Performance", Journal of Management, 27, pp. 23-50.
COMITÉ ALDAMA (2003) Informe de la Comisión Especial para el fomento de la transparencia y seguridad en los mercados y en las sociedades cotizadas. Consejo de Ministros. Madrid
COMITÉ CONTHE (2006) Informe del grupo especial de trabajo sobre buen gobierno de las sociedades cotizadas. Consejo de Ministros. Madrid.
COMITÉ OLIVENCIA (1998) Informe del Comité Olivencia sobre el Gobierno de las Sociedades. Consejo de Ministros. Madrid.
CONGER, J.; D. FINEGOLD and E. LAWLER (1998) "Appraising Boardroom Performance", Harvard Business Review, 74, pp. 136-148.
DECHOW, P.M.; R.G. SLOAN and A.P. SWEENEY (1996) "Causes and
Consequences of Earnings Manipulations: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC", Contemporary Accounting Research, 13, pp. 1-13.
DEFOND, M.L. and J. JIALBALVO (1991) "Incidence and Circumstances of Accounting Errors", The Accounting Review, 13 (3), pp. 643-655.
DEWENTER, K.L. and V.A. WARTHER (1998) "Dividends, Asymmetrics Information and Agency Conflicts. Evidence from a Comparison of the Dividend Policies of JAPANESE and U. S. Firms", Journal of Finance, 53 (3), pp. 879-904.
DONALDSON, L. and J.H. DAVIS (1991) "Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Return", Australian Journal of Management, 16, pp. 49-64.
DYE, R.A. (1990) "Mandatory Versus Voluntary Disclosures: The Cases of Finance", Accounting Review, 65, pp. 1-24.
EISENBERG, T.; S. SUNDGREEN and M.T. WELLS (1998) "Larger Board Size and
Decreasing Firm Value and Small Firms", Journal of Financial Economics, 48, pp. 35-54.
FAMA, E.F. (1980) "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm", Journal of Political Economy, 88 (2), pp. 288-307.
FAMA, E.F. and M.C. JENSEN (1983) "Separation of Ownership and Control", The Journal of Law and Economics, 25, pp. 301–326.
FRANCIS, J.R. and E.R. WILSON (1988) "Auditor Changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation", Accounting Review, 63, pp. 663–682.
GARCÍA OSMA, B. y B. GILL DE ALBORNOZ (2005) "El gobierno corporativo y las prácticas de earnings management: Evidencia empírica en España", Instituto Valenciano de Economía y Hacienda, 7, pp. 25-48.
GARCÍA SOTO, M.G.; J.M. GARCÍA FALCÓN y F.R. ÁLAMO VERA (2005) "El
gobierno corporativo, la estrategia de diversificación y los resultados: evidencia en las cajas de ahorro españolas", Revista de Contabilidad y Tributación, 266, pp.161-212.
HEALY, P.M. and K.G. PALEPU (2001) "Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature", Journal of Accounting & Economics, 31 (1–3), 405.
HERMALIN, B.E. and M.S. WEISBACH (2003) "Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature", Economic Policy Review, 9 (1), pp. 7-26.
HO, S.S.M. and K.S. WONG (2001) "A Study of the Relationship Between Corporate Governance Structures and the Extent of Voluntary Disclosure", Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10, pp. 139-156.
HOOGENDOORN, M. (2000) "A Financial Statement Model Based on Shareholder Value, a Theoretical Approach and the Views of the IASC", Paper presentado en el 23rd annual Congress of EAA, Munich.
HUSE, M. (1998) "Researching the Dynamics of Board-stakeholder Relations", Long Range Planning, 31, pp. 218-226.
HUSE, M. and E. EIDE (1996) "Stakeholder Management and the Avoidance of Corporate Control", Business and Society, 35, pp. 323-329.
JENSEN, M.C. (1986) "Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers", American Economic Review, vol. 76, pp. 323-329.
JENSEN, M.C. (1993) "The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems", Journal of Finance, 48, pp. 831-880.
KEASEY, K. and M. WRIGHT (1993) "Issues in Corporate Accountability and Governance: An Editorial", Accounting and Business Research, 23 (91 A), pp. 291-303.
KIM, J.B.; R. CHUNG and M. FIRTH (2003) "Auditor Conservatism, Asymmetric Monitoring and Discretionary Accrual Choices", Contemporary Accounting Research, 20, pp. 323-359.
KLEIN, A. (2002) "Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics and Earnings Management", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33 (3), pp. 375-400.
LANG, L. and R. LITZENBERGER (1989) "Dividend Announcements: Cash-flow Signalling vs. Cash-flow Hypotheses", Journal of Financial Economics, 24 (1), pp. 181-191.
LANG, L.; A. POULSEN and R. STULZ (1995) "Asset Sales, Firm Performance and the Agency Cost of Managerial Discretion", Journal of Financial Economics, 20, pp. 1077-1086.
LIPTON, M. and J. LORSCH (1992) "A Model Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance", Business Lawyer, vol. 48, pp. 59-77.
MAASEN, G.F. (1999) An International Comparison of Corporate Governance Models. Amsterdam: Spencer Stuart.
MENÉNDEZ REQUEJO, S. (2001) "Estructura de capital de la empresa española ante problemas de riesgo moral y selección adversa", Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de Empresa, 10, pp. 485-498.
MUÑOZ PAREDES, J.M. (2004) Nuevas tecnologías en el funcionamiento de las Juntas generales y de los consejos de administración. Madrid: Editorial Civitas.
O'SULLIVAN, N. (2000) "The Impact of Board Composition and Ownership on Audit. Quality: Evidence from Large UK Companies", British Accounting Review, 32, pp. 397-414.
PAULUS, O. and F. ROTH (2000) "Une grille pour une comparaison internationale des gouvernements d'entreprise: applicationau cas de la Frace ek de l'Allemagne sous iángle de la confiance", XV Journêes nationales des IAE. Bayona-Biarritz.
PEARCE, J.A. and S.A. ZAHRA (1992) "Board Compensation from a Strategic Contingency Perspective", Journal of Management Studies, 29, pp. 411-438.
PEASNELL, K.; P. POPE and S. YOUNG (2001) "The Characteristics of Firms Subject to Adverse Rulings by the Financial Reporting Review Panel", Accounting and Business Research, 31 (4), pp. 291-311.
PROWSE, S. (1995) "Corporate Governance in a International Perspective: A Survey of Corporate Control Mechanisms Among Large Firms in the U.S., U.K., Japan y Germany", Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 4, pp. 1-63.
RODRÍGUEZ FERNÁNDEZ, J.M. (2003) El gobierno de la empresa: un enfoque alternativo. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.
ROSENSTEIN, S. and J.G. WYATT (1990) "Outside Directors, Board Independence and Shareholder Wealth", Journal of Financial Economic, 26, pp. 175-191.
SALAS FUMÁS, V. (2002) "El gobierno de la empresa", Colección de Estudios Económicos de la Caixa, núm. 29, Barcelona.
SAUDARAN, S. (2001) International Accounting: A User Perspective. South- Western, London: Thomson Learning.
SHLEIFER, A. and R.W. VISNHY (1986) "Large Schareholders and Corporate Control", Journal of Political Economy, 94 (3), pp. 458-461.
SHORT, H.; K. KEASEY, M. WRIGHT and A. HULL (1999) "Corporate Governance: From Accountability to Enterprise", Accounting and Business Research, 29 (4), pp. 337-352.
SMITH, A. (1994) "Competencia imperfecta y comercio internacional", Información Comercial Española, 755, pp. 33-46.
SINGH, H. and W.N. DAVIDSON (2003) "Agency Cost, Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance Mechanisms", Journal of Banking & Finance, 27, pp. 793-816.
SPIRA, L.F. (1999) "Ceremonies of Governance: Perspectives on the Role of the Audit Committee", Journal of Management and Governance, 3, pp. 231-260.
STEINFIELD, C.; H. BOUWMAN and T. ADELAAR (2002) "The Dynamics of Click-and- mortar Electronic Commerce: Opportunities and Management Strategies", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 1, pp. 93–119.
VAFEAS, N. (1999) "Board Meeting Frequency and Firm Performance", Journal of Financial Economics, 53, pp. 113-142.
WEALE, A. (2000) "Government by Committee. Three Principles of Evaluation". T. CHRISTIANSEN and E. KIRCHNER (eds.) Committee Governance in the European Union. Manchester University Press.
WEISBACH, M.S. (1988) "Outside Directors and CEO Turnover", Journal of Financial Economic, 20, pp. 431-460.
WHITTINGTON, G. (1993) "Corporate Governance and the Regulation of Financial Reporting", Accounting and Business Research, 23 (91), pp. 311-319.
XIE, B.; W.N. DAVIDSON III and D.J. DADALT (2003) "Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Roles of the Board and Audit Committee", Journal of Corporate Finance, 9 (3), pp. 295-316.
YERMARCK, D. (1996) "Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors", Journal of Financial Economics, 40, pp. 185-213.
ZAHRA, S.A. and J.A. PEARCE (1989) "Board of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrate Model", Journal of Management, 15 (2), pp. 291-334.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2008 María del Mar Alonso Almeida
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:- Los autores ceden de forma no exclusiva los derechos de explotación (reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública, transformación) a la Universidad de León, por lo que pueden establecer, por separado, acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, alojarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Este trabajo se encuentra bajo la Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Puede consultarse desde aquí la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia.
- Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.