La valoración económica de los ecoservicios en los agroecosistemas en España: Marco conceptual y metodológico = The economic valuation of ecosystem services in the agroecosystems in Spain: Conceptual framework and methodology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18002/pec.v0i22.5068Palavras-chave:
Marco conceptual, Servicios de los ecosistemas, Agroecosistemas, Valoración económica, España, Conceptual framework, Ecosystem services, Agroecosystems, Economic valuation, SpainResumo
El estudio de la valoración de los servicios de los ecosistemas es un área de investigación reciente en España pero que ha cobrado un fuerte impulso durante las últimas décadas. El carácter multidimensional de estos servicios, la diversidad de beneficiarios y partes interesadas, y los diferentes enfoques valorativos existentes hacen que su valoración resulte compleja. En este trabajo se presenta el marco conceptual para la valoración de los servicios provistos por los ecosistemas y una descripción de las metodologías más utilizadas, aplicado a los agroecosistemas españoles. Para ello se ha realizado una búsqueda en la base de datos del Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), dando como resultado una muestra de 101 trabajos. La metodología utilizada para su análisis ha sido de tipo cualitativo. Los resultados obtenidos muestran como el grueso de los trabajos de valoración de ecoservicios provistos por agroecosistemas en España se ha publicado durante los últimos cinco años y que entre las metodologías económicas más utilizadas destacan el análisis coste-beneficio, la valoración contingente y los experimentos de elección.
The study of the valuation of ecosystem services is a recent area of research in Spain but has gained strong impulse during the last decades. The multidimensional nature of these services, in addition to the diversity of related beneficiaries and actors, and the different approaches make their evaluation is complex. This paper presents the conceptual framework for the assessment of services provided by ecosystems and a description of the methodologies most used, applied to Spanish agroecosystems. To this end, it has conducted a search in the database of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), resulting in a sample of 101 papers. The methodology used for the analysis was qualitative. The results show how the majority of the proyect on valuation of ecosystem services provided by agroecosystems in Spain has been published for the past five years and between the most used economic methodologies include the cost-benefit analysis, contingent valuation and choice experiments.
Downloads
Referências
Almansa, C. y Martínez-Paz, J.M. (2011). What weight should be assigned to future environmental impacts? A probabilistic cost benefit analysis using recent advances on discounting. Science of the Total Environment, 409(7), 1305–1314.
Andrés, S., García, J.M. y Median, I.M. (2012). El apoyo público a la agricultura española en el actual contexto de la Política Agrícola Común. ITEA-Información Técnica Económica Agraria, 108(4), 450–481.
Anton, C., Young, J., Harrison, P.A., Musche, M., Bela, G., Feld, C.K., Harrington, R., Haslett, J.R., Pataki, G., Rounsevell, M.D.A., Skourtus, M., Sousa, J.P., Sykes, M.T., Tinch, R., Vandewalle, M., Watt, A. y Settele, J. (2010). Research needs for incorporating the ecosystem service approach into EU biodiversity conservation policy. Biodiversity Conservation, 19, 2979–2994.
Atance Muñiz, I. y Tió Saralegui, C. (2000). La multifuncionalidad de la agricultura: aspectos económicos e implicaciones sobre la política agraria. Revista de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros, 189, 29–48.
Bangash, R.F., Passuello, A., Sánchez-Canales, M., Terrado, M., López, A., Elorza, F.J., Ziv, G., Acuña, V. y Schuhmacher, M. (2013). Ecosystem services in Mediterranean river basin: Climate change impact on water provisioning and erosion control. Science of the Total Environment, 458–460, 246–255.
Bastianoni, S., Pulselli, F.M. y Rustici, M. (2006). Exergy versus emergy flow in ecosystems: is there an order in maximizations? Ecological Indicators, 6, 58–62.
Boithias, L., Acuña, V., Vergoñós, L., Ziv, G., Marcé, R. y Sabater, S. (2014). Assessment of the water supply: Demand ratios in a Mediterranean basin under different global change scenarios and mitigation alternatives. Science of the Total Environment, 470–471, 567–577.
Brenner, J., Jiménez, J.A., Sardá, R. y Garola, A. (2010). An assessment of the non-market value of the ecosystem services provided by the Catalan coastal zone, Spain. Ocean and Coastal Management, 53, 27–38.
Bujosa-Bestard, A. y Riera-Font, A. (2009). Environmental diversity in recreational choice modelling. Ecological Economics, 68, 2743–2750. Burkhard, B., de Groot, R., Costanza, R., Seppelt, R., Jorgensen, S.E. y Potschin, M. (2012).
Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 21, 1–6.
Calvet-Mir, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E. y Reyes-García, V. (2012). Beyond food production: Ecosystem services provided by home gardens. A case study in Vall Fosca, Catalan Pyrenees, Northeastern Spain. Ecological Economics, 74, 153–160.
Casado-Arzuaga, I., Onaindia, M., Madariaga, I. y Verburg, P.H. (2014). Mapping recreation and aesthetic value of ecosystems in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt (northern Spain) to support landscape planning. Landscape Ecology, 29, 1393–1405.
Castro, A.J., García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., Palomo, I. e Iniesta-Arandía, I. (2013). Multidimensional approaches in ecosystem services assessment. En, C. Di Bella y D. Alcaraz-Segura (Eds.). Earth Observation of Ecosystem Services (pp. 441–468). CRC Press.
Castro, A.J., Verburg, P.H., Martín-López, B., García-Llorente, M., Cabello, J., Vaughn, C.C. y López, E. (2014). Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: A landscape-scale spatial analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 132, 102–110.
Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T. y Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8–18.
Cossarini, D.M., MacDonald, B.H., Wells, P.G. (2014). Communicating marine environmental information to decision makers: enablers and barriers to use of publications (grey literature) of the Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment. Ocean & Coastal Management, 96, 163-172.
Cummings, R.G. y Taylor, L.O. (1999). Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. The American Economic Review, 89(3), 649–665.
De Groot, R.S., Wilson, M.A. y Boumans, R.M.J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393–408.
De Groot, R.S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L. y Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7, 260–272.
Deacon, S., Norman, S., Nicolette, J., Reub, G., Greene, G., Osborn, R. y Andrews, P. (2015). Integrating ecosystem services into risk management decisions: Case study with Spanish citrus and the insecticide chlorpyrifos. Science of the Total Environment, 505, 732–739.
Díaz, S., Fargione, J., Chapín, F.S. y Tilman, D. (2006). Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. Plos Biology, 4, 1300–1305.
Evaluación de los Ecosistemas del Milenio de España (EME) (2012). La evaluación de los Ecosistemas del Milenio de España. Síntesis de resultados. Madrid: Fundación Biodiversidad. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, y Medio Rural y Marino.
Fisher, B., Turner, K.R. y Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643–653.
Flores-Velásquez, P., Martínez de Anguita, P., Romero-Calcerrada, R., Novillo, C.J. y Ruiz, M.A. (2008). Los sistemas de pago por servicios ambientales entre la adicionalidad y la subsidiariedad: aplicación a la belleza escénica en el pantano de San Juan, Madrid, España. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 17(1), 39–53.
García de Jalón, S., Iglesias, A., Cunningham, R. y Pérez Díaz, J.E. (2014). Building resilience to water scarcity in southern Spain: a case study of rice farming in Doñana protected wetlands. Regional Environmental Change, 14, 1229–1242.
García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B. y Montes, C. (2011). Exploring the motivations of protesters in contingent valuation: Insights for conservation policies. Environmental Science ad Policy, 14, 76–88.
García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., López-Santiago, C.A., Aguilera, P.A. y Montes, C. (2012). The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach. Environmental Science and Policy, 19–20, 136–146.
García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., Nunes, P.A.L.D., Castro, A.J. y Montes, C. (2012). A choice experiment study for land-use scenarios in semi-arid watershed environments. Journal of Arid Environments, 87, 219–230.
Gómez-Limón, J.A. y Atance Muñiz, I. (2004). Identificación de objetivos públicos para el apoyo al sector agrario. Revista de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros, 203, 49–84.
Gómez-Sal, A. (2001). Aspectos ecológicos de los sistemas agrícolas. Las dimensiones del desarrollo. En: Labrador, J. y Altieri, M.A., (Eds.) Agroecología y Desarrollo. Madrid: Mundi Prensa.
Gómez-Sal, A. (2011). Entender la naturaleza ibérica. Los ecosistemas humanizados. En: Informe de Sostenibilidad en España. Especial Los bosques en España. OSE. Madrid: Fundación Biodiversidad, Universidad de Alcalá.
Jørgensen, S.E. (1982). A holistic approach to ecological modeling by application of thermodynamics. In, W. Mitsch, et al. (Eds.), Energetics and Systems (pp. 72-82). Ann Arbor Science, 176, MI: Ann Arbor.
Layke, C., Mapendembe, A., Brown, C., Walpole, M., y Winn, J. (2012). Indicators from the global and sub-global Millennium Ecosystem Assessments: an analysis and next steps. Ecological Indicators, 17, 77–87.
Lomas, P.L., Álvarez, S., Rodríguez, M. y Montes, C. (2008). Environmental accounting as a management tool in the Mediterranean context: The Spanish economy during the last 20 years. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 326–347.
Marchi, M., Jørgensen, S.E., Bécares, E., Fernández-Aláez, C., Rodríguez, C., Fernández-Aláez, M., Pulselli, F.M., Marchettini, N. y Bastianoni, S. (2012). Effects of eutrophication and exotic crayfish on health status of two Spanish lakes: a joint application of ecological indicators. Ecological Indicators, 20, 92–100.
Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Lomas, P.L. y Montes, C. (2009). Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1050–1059.
Martín-López, B. y Montes, C. (2010). Funciones y servicios de los ecosistemas: una herramienta para la gestión de los espacios naturales (pp. 13-32). Guía científica de Urdaibai, UNESCO. Bilbao: Dirección de Biodiversidad y Participación Ambiental del Gobierno Vasco.
Martín-López, B., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I. y Montes, C. (2011). The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social–ecological system (southwestern Spain). Ecological Economics, 70, 1481–1491.
Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., García-Llorente, M. y Montes, C. (2014). Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecological Indicators, 37, 220–228.
Martínez de Aragón, J., Riera, P., Giergiczny, M. y Colinas, C. (2011). Value of wild mushroom picking as an environmental service. Forest Policy and Economics, 13, 419–424.
Martínez-Paz, J.A., Perni, A. y Martínez-Carrasco, F. (2013). Assessment of the Programme of Measures for Coastal Lagoon Environmental Restoration Using Cost–Benefit Analysis. European Planning Studies, 21(2), 131–148.
Martínez-Paz, J., Pellicer-Martínez, F. y Colino, J. (2014). A probabilistic approach for the socioeconomic assessment of urban river rehabilitation projects. Land Use Policy, 36, 468–477.
Millennnium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity. Washington: Synthesis.
Morán-Ordóñez, A., Bugter, R., Suárez-Seoane, S., de Luis, E. y Calvo, L. (2013). Temporal changes in socio-ecological systems and their impact on ecosystem services at different governance scales: A case study of heathlands. Ecosystems, 16, 765–782.
Murillas-Maza, A., Virto, J., Gallastegui, M.C., González, P. y Fernández-Macho, J. (2011). The value of open ocean ecosystems: A case study for the Spanish exclusive economic zone. Natural Resources Forum, 35, 122–133.
Murphy, J.J. y Stevens, T.H. (2004). Contingent valuation, hypothetical bias and experimental economics. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 33(2), 182–192.
Núñez, M., Antón, A., Muñoz, P. y Rieradevall, J. (2013). Inclusion of soil erosion impacts in life cycle assessment on a global scale: application to energy crops in Spain. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 755–767.
Odum, H.T. (1996). Environmental accounting: Emergy and enviromental decision making. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ojea, E., Ruiz-Benito, P., Markandya, A. y Zavala, M.A. (2012). Wood provisioning in Mediterranean forests: A bottom-up spatial valuation approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 20, 78–88.
Orrantia-Albizu, O., Ortega-Hidalgo, M.M., Quirós-Madrigal, O. y Loidi-Arregui, J. (2008). Servicios ambientales del bosque: ensayo en una cuenca atlántica europea con base en la experiencia de Centroamérica. Revista de Biología Tropical, 56, 2087–2098.
Päetzold, A., Warren, P.H., y Maltby, L.L. (2010). A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity, 7, 273–281.
Palacios-Agundez, I., Fernández de Manuel, B., Rodríguez-Loinaz, G., Peña, L., Ametzaga-Arregi, I., Alday, J.G., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Madariaga, I., Arana, X. y Onaindia, M. (2014). Integrating stakeholders’ demands and scientific knowledge on ecosystem services in landscape planning. Landscape Ecology, 29, 1423–1433.
Palomo, I., Martín-López, B., Zorrilla-Miras, P., García del Amo, D. y Montes, C. (2014). Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Regional Environmental Change, 14, 237–251.
Pearce, D.W. y Turner, R.K. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. Hemel Hempstead and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Puerta-Piñero, C., Brotons, L., Coll, L. y González-Olabarría, J.R. (2012). Valuing acorn dispersal and resprouting capacity ecological functions to ensure Mediterranean forest resilience after fire. European Journal of Forest Research, 131, 835–844.
Pullin, A.S. y Stewart, G.B. (2006). Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, 20, 1647–1656.
Reyes-García, V., Calvet-Mir, L., Vila, S., Aceituno-Mata, L., Garnatje, T., Lastra, J.J., Parada, M., Rigat, M., Vallès, J. y Pardo de Santayana, M. (2012). Does crop diversification pay off? An empirical study in home gardens of the Iberian Peninsula. Society and Natural Resources, 0, 1–16.
Ripoll-Bosch, R., de Boer, I.J.M., Bernués, A. y Vellinga, T.V. (2013). Accounting for multi-functionality of sheep farming in the carbon footprint of lamb: A comparison of three contrasting Mediterranean systems. Agricultural Systems, 116, 60–68.
Robertson, G.P. y Swinton, S.M. (2005). Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: a grand challenge for agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3, 38–46.
Ruiz-Benito, P., Gómez-Aparicio, L. y Zavala, M.A. (2012). Large-scale assessment of regeneration and diversity in Mediterranean planted pine forests along ecological gradients. Diversity and Distributions, 18, 1092–1106.
Sánchez-Canales, M., López-Benito, A., Passuello, A., Terrado, M., Ziv, G., Acuña, V., Schuhmacher, M. y Elorza, F.J. (2012). Sensitivity analysis of ecosystem service valuation in a Mediterranean watershed. Science of the Total Environment, 440, 140–153.
Sánchez-Canales, M., López-Benito, A., Acuña, V., Ziv, G., Hamel, P., Chaplin-Kramer, R. y Elorza, F.J. (2015). Sensitivity analysis of a sediment dynamics model applied in a Mediterranean river basin: Global change and management implications. Science of the Total Environment, 502, 602–610.
Seppelt, R., Dormann, C.F., Eppink, F.V., Lautenbach, S. y Schmidt, S. (2011). A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 630–636.
Surís-Regueiro, J.C. y Santiago, J.L. (2014). Characterization of fisheries dependence in Galicia (Spain). Marine Policy, 47, 99–109.
Syrbe, R.U. y Walz, U. (2012). Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators, 21, 80–88.
Tallis, H. y Polasky, S. (2009). Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162, 265–283.
Trabucchi, M., Comín, F.A. y O’Farrell, P.J. (2013). Hierarchical priority setting for restoration in a watershed in NE Spain, based on assessments of soil erosion and ecosystem services. Regional Environmental Change, 13, 911–926.
Vidal-Legaz, B., Martínez-Fernández, J., Sánchez-Picón, A. y Pugnaire, F.I. (2013). Trade-offs between maintenance of ecosystem services and socio-economic development in rural mountainous communities in southern Spain: A dynamic simulation approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 131, 280–297.
Voces-González, R., Díaz-Balteiro, L. y López-Peredo, E. (2010). Spatial valuation of recreation activities in forest systems: application to province of Segovia (Spain). Forest Systems, 19(1), 36–50.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Juan Francisco Velasco Muñoz, José Ángel Aznar Sánchez
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:- Los autores ceden de forma no exclusiva los derechos de explotación (reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública, transformación) a la Universidad de León, por lo que pueden establecer, por separado, acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, alojarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Este trabajo se encuentra bajo la Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Puede consultarse desde aquí la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia.
- Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.