The Kung Fu Family: A metaphor of belonging across time and place
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18002/rama.v13i1.5462Keywords:
Collective identity, conceptual metaphor, Chinese martial arts, family, lineage, martial artsAbstract
Kung Fu associations are often understood as ‘families’ forming broader ‘family trees’ or lineages operating across centuries of history as well as transcultural associations. In an effort contributing to interdisciplinary martial arts studies, this paper presents data from two qualitative studies of Western practitioners of traditionalist Chinese martial arts (TCMA) in both the West and Asia by a phenomenological psychologist and an anthropological sociologist. We assess the use of the term ‘Kung Fu family’, what it means to the practitioners and how it impacts on their practice and their relationships with other martial artists. We argue that the conceptual metaphor of family offers a sense of belonging and solidarity within a diverse community in terms of age, ethnicity, gender, religion and social class. Meanwhile, we explore the metaphor in terms of the micro-political power dynamics that accompany martial arts collectives. Overall, the ideal of family can illuminate how identity can transcend across time (‘generations’ of practitioners) and place (from and to cultures and contingents). It is thus a way of understanding the organisation, spread and transcendence of Chinese martial arts.
Downloads
Métricas alternativas
References
Allen, B. (2013). Games of sport, works of art, and the striking beauty of Asian martial arts. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 40(2), 241-254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2013.785418
Alter, J. (1992). The wrestler’s body: Identity and ideology in North India. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bowman, P. (Ed.). (Forthcoming). Martial arts studies: A reader. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bowman, P. (2015). Martial arts studies: Disrupting disciplinary boundaries. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Brown, D. (2016). Taoism through Tai Chi Chuan: Physical culture as religious or holistic spirituality? In M. de Souza, J. Bone and J. Watson (Eds.), Spirituality across disciplines: Research and practice (pp. 317-330). New York: Springer.
Brown, D., & Jennings, G. (2011). Body lineage: Conceptualizing the transmission of traditional Asian martial arts (in the West). Staps, 32(93), 61-71.
Brown, D., & Jennings, G. (2013). In search of the martial habitus: Identifying dispositional schemes in Wing Chun and Taijiquan. In R. Garcia Sánchez & D. Spencer (Eds.), Fighting Scholars: Habitus and ethnographies of martial arts and combat sports (pp. 33-48). London: Anthem Press.
Brown, D., Jennings, G. & Sparkes, A.C. (2014). Taijiquan the ‘Taiji World’ way: Towards a cosmopolitan vision of ecology. Societies, 4(3), 380-398. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4030380
Brown, D., & Johnson, A. (2000). The social practice of self-defence martial arts: Applications for physical education. Quest, 52(3), 246-259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2000.10491713
Channon, A., & Jennings, G. (2013). The rules of engagement: Negotiating painful and intimate touch in mixed-sex martial arts. Sociology of Sport Journal, 30, 487-503. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.30.4.487
Channon, A., & Phipps, C. (2017). ‘Pink gloves still give black eyes’: Exploring ‘alternative’ femininity in women’s combat sports. Martial Arts Studies, 3, 24-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.18573/j.2017.10093
De Campos Rosario, C., Stephens, N., & Delamont, S. (2010). ‘I’m your teacher! I’m Brazilian!’: Authenticity and authority in European Capoeira. Sport, Education & Society, 15(1), 103-120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13573320903461061
Domaneschi, L. (2016). Boards don’t hit back: Ethnography of the practice of Wushu Kung Fu. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 3, 473-496. doi: https://doi.org/10.3240/85153
Downey, G. (2004). Learning capoeira: Lessons in cunning from an Afro-Brazilian martial art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ebaugh, H. R., & Curry, M. (2000). Fictive kin as social capital in new immigrant communities. Sociological Perspectives, 43(2), 189-209. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1389793
Evans, B., Eys, M., & Wolf, S. (2013). Exploring the nature of interpersonal influence in elite individual sport teams. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 4, 448-462. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2012.752769
Evans, M.B., Eys, M.A., & Bruner, M.W. (2012). Seeing the “we” in “me” sports: The need to consider individual sport team environments. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 53(4), 301-308. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030202
Farrer, D. S. (2011). Coffee-shop gods: Martial arts of the Singapore diaspora. In D.S. Farrer and J. Whalen-Bridge (Eds.), Martial arts and embodied knowledge: Asian traditions in a transnational world (pp. 203-229). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Farrer, D. S. (2018). Captivation, false connection and secret societies in Singapore. Martial Arts Studies, 5, 36-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.18573/mas.48
Flowers, P. Larkin, M., & Smith, J. A. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Frank, A. (2014). Unstructuring structure and communicating secrets inside/outside a Chinese martial arts association. JOMEC Journal, (5). doi: http://doi.org/10.18573/j.2014.10269
Frank, A. (2006). Taijiquan and the search for the little old Chinese man: Understanding identity through martial arts (1st ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late-modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Girton, G. D. (1986). Kung fu: Towards a praxiological hermeneutics of the martial arts. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Ethnomethodological studies of work (pp. 60-91). London: Routledge.
Green, K. (2011). It hurts, so it is real: Sensing the seduction of mixed martial arts. Cultural and Social Geography, 12(4), 377–396. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2011.574796
Green, T. A. & Svinth, J. R. (Eds.). (2004). Martial arts in the modern world. London: Praeger.
Guodong, Z., Green, T. A., & Gutiérrez-García, C. (2016). Rural community, group identity and martial arts: Social foundation of Meihuaquan. IDO Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 16(1), 18-29. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14589/ido.16.1.3
Jennings, G. (2014). Transmitting health philosophies through the traditionalist Chinese martial arts in the UK. Societies, 4(4), 712-736. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4040712
Jennings, G. (2010). Fighters, thinkers and shared cultivation: Experiencing transformation through the traditionalist Chinese martial arts. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Exeter, UK.
Jennings, G., Brown, D., & Sparkes, A. C. (2010). “It can be a religion if you want”: Wing Chun Kung Fu as a secular religion. Ethnography, 11(4), 533-557. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138110372588
Judkins, B., (2014). Inventing Kung Fu. JOMEC Journal, (5). doi: http://doi.org/10.18573/j.2014.10272
Judkins, B., & Nielson, J. (2016). The creation of Wing Chun: A history of the southern Chinese martial arts. Albany, NY: Press.
Kennedy, B., & Guo, E. (2010). Jingwu: The school that transformed Kung Fu. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
Kennedy, B., & Guo, E. (2005). Chinese martial arts training manuals: A historical survey. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
Kim, E. C. (2009). ‘Mama’s family’: Fictive kinship and undocumented immigrant restaurant workers. Ethnography, 4, 497-513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138109347000
Lakoff, G. (1992). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd edition) (pp. 202-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Layton, C., Higaonna, M., & Arneil, S. (1993). Karate for self-defense: an analysis of Goju-Ryu and Kyokushinkai Kata. Peceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 829–830. doi: http://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1993.77.3.829
Mroz, D. (2008). Technique in exile: The changing perception of taijiquan, from Ming dynasty military exercise to twentieth-century actor training protocol. Studies in Theatre and Performance, 28(2), 127-145.
Nulty, T.J. (2017). Gong and fa in Chinese martial arts. Martial Arts Studies, 3, 51-64. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18573/j.2017.10098
Partikova, V. (in press a). Psychological collectivism in traditional martial arts. Martial Arts Studies.
Partikova, V. (in press b). Testing the model of mental toughness in the setting of Chinese martial arts. Asian Journal of Physical Education & Recreation.
Pedrini, L. (2018). Muoversi come puligi colprire como compagni: Uno studio etnografico sull’organizzazione sociale della boxe popolare. Unpublished doctorate thesis, University of Milano-Bicocca.
Ryan, A. (2008). Globalisation and the ‘internal alchemy’ in Chinese martial arts: The transmission of Taijiquan to Britain. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 2(4), 525-543. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/s12280-009-9073-x
Samino, E., & Masci, M. (1996). Politics in football: Metaphor in the discourse of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy. Discourse & Society, 7(2), 243-269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007002005
Shields, D., & Bredemeier, B. (2011). Contest, competition and metaphor. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 38, 27-38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2011.9714547
Smith, J., A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53-80). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Smith, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (2004). Men, sport, and spinal cord injury: An analysis of metaphors and narrative types. Disability & Society, 19(6), 613-626. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759042000252533
Stewart, C., Smith, B. & Sparkes, A. C. (2011). Sporting autobiographies of illness and the role of metaphor. Sport in Society, 14(5), 581-597. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2011.574358
Theeboom, M., & De Knop, P. (1997). An analysis of the development of Wushu. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 32(3), 267-282. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690297032003004
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Vlachos, E. (2015). The benefits of using traditional martial arts as an intervention programme for children with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties. Journal of Pedagogic Development, 5(2), 37-45.
Von del Lippe, G. (2002). Media image: Sport, gender and national identities in five European countries. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 3-4, 369-394. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/101269020203700306
Wacquant, L. (2001). Whores, slaves and stallions: Languages of exploitation and accommodation among boxers. Body & Society, 7(2-3), 181-194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X0100700210
Wang, G., Qiu, P. X., & Bao, L. (2010). The "boxing type awareness" must be enhanced for rebuilding the school Wushu education system. Journal of Physical Education, 17(4), 95-98.
Wildish, P. (2000). The big book of chi. London: Thornsons.
Wile, D. (2018). Fighting words: Four new document finds reignite old debates in Taijiquan historiography. Martial Arts Studies, 4, 17-35. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18573/j.2017.10184
Woodward, K. (2008). Hanging out and hanging about: Insider/outsider research in the sport of boxing. Ethnography, 9(4), 536-560. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108096991
Yu, N. (2003). Chinese metaphors of thinking. Cognitive Linguistics, 14(2-3), 141-165. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2003.006
Zarrilli, P.B. (1998). When the body becomes all eyes: Paradigms, discourses and practices of power in a South Indian martial art. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Zhang, Z. (2014). The art of Chinese kung-fu. Berkeley, CA: Gingko Press.
Zhang, G., & Green, T. (2012). Introducción al boxeo de la flor del ciruelo: historia, cultura y práctica. Revista de Artes Marciales Asiáticas, 5(2), 21-44. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18002/rama.v5i2.109
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Veronika Partikova, George Jennings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal must agree to the following terms:
- The authors grant on a nonexclusive basis the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication and transformation) of the work accepted for publication to the University of León. The authors can establish, on their own, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), always acknowledging the initial publication in this journal.
- This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Click to see basic information and the legal text of the license.
- The authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate electronically pre-print or post-print versions of their work before publication, as this can give rise to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and increased citing of the works published.
