An archetypal analysis of Katniss Everdeen from The Hunger Games

Autores/as

  • Maya Zalbidea Paniagua Profesora AsociadaDepartamento de Estudios inglesesFacultad de FilologíaUniversidad Complutense de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18002/cg.v0i16.6932

Palabras clave:

comparative literature, myth criticism, gender theory, feminism, psychoanalysis

Agencias Financiadoras:

UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID

Resumen

Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games trilogy invites to reflect on the exchange of gender roles metaphorically performed by a female and male protagonists who play the warrior as well as the family protector roles. From a myth-critical theoretical framework and applying psychoanalysis in literature methodology, this article will provide a feminist analysis of The Hunger Games trilogy (2008-2020) focusing on how the protagonists, Katniss Everdeen and Peeta Mellark, deconstruct gender stereotypes. Peeta Mellark will be regarded as a future man who supports gender equality while Katniss Everdeen will be considered a representation of goddesses’ archetypes applying Carl Gustav Jung’s (1970) approach on archetypes and collective unconsciousness as well as Jean Shinoda Bolen’s (2010) theories of feminine psychology based on Greek goddesses archetypes. 

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas alternativas

Biografía del autor/a

Maya Zalbidea Paniagua, Profesora AsociadaDepartamento de Estudios inglesesFacultad de FilologíaUniversidad Complutense de Madrid

Is Associate Professor at Complutense University of Madrid where she teaches “Introduction to Literary Texts in English Language” and “English Literature from 1800 to 1900” (From Gothic and Romantic to Victorian Fiction). She has worked in Elmcip project archiving collections of Electronic Literature and has published 15 publications about comparative literature, feminist studies and electronic literature. She is a member of Studies on Intermediality and Intercultural Mediation and is currently working in Aglaya Mythcriticism Project.

Citas

Anam, Choerul and Taufiqurrahman, Febri (2020): “The Appearance of Gender in the Main Characters in The Hunger Games (Gender Analysis)”. In: World Conference on Gender Studies, KnE Social Sciences, pp. 102–107. Available in: https://knepublishing.com/index.php/KnE-Social/article/view/7397 [27/02/2021].

Bolen Shinoda, Jean (2014): Artemis: The Indomitable Spirit in Everywoman. San Francisco: Coneri Press.

Bolen Shinoda, Jean (1984): Goddesses in Everywoman: Powerful Archetypes in Women's Lives. New York: Harpercollins.

Cixous, Hélène (1975): “The Laugh of the Medusa”. In: Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism, Houndmills: Macmillan Press.

Collins, Suzanne (2008): The Hunger Games. New York: Scholastic Press.

Everett, Sheila (2008): “Suzanne Collins Q & A conversation”. Interview by Sheila Marie Everett, Scholastic Inc. Available in: http://mediaroom.scholastic.com/files/Suzanne_Collins_Q&A_on_Letterhead_Mockingjay.pdf [27/02/2021].

Journal Psyche (1994-2018): “The Jungian Model of the Psyche”. Available in: http://journalpsyche.org/jungian-model-psyche/ [27/02/2021].

Janes, Linda (2003): “The Gendered Cyborg: A Reader”. In “Feminist Theory and Science Fiction”, edited by Veronica Hollinger, 92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jung, Carl G. (2014): The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Translated by R.F.C. Hull, London and New York: Routledge.

Lawrence, Francis (2012): The Hunger Games: Mockingjay-Part I, Film.

Lawrence, Francis (2015): The Hunger Games: Mockingjay-Part II, Film.

Saez Garrido, Ana (2017): “Discourses of Masculinity in Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games Trilogy: Defending The Alternative Man, Peeta Mellark”. Trabajo de Fin de Grado. Tutor: Sara Martín Alegre. June 2017. Available in: https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/tfg/2017/180064/Saez_Garrido_ANA_TFG_2016-2017.pdf [09/06/2021].

Descargas

Publicado

2021-06-29

Cómo citar

Zalbidea Paniagua, M. (2021) «An archetypal analysis of Katniss Everdeen from The Hunger Games», Cuestiones de Género: de la igualdad y la diferencia, (16), pp. 270–280. doi: 10.18002/cg.v0i16.6932.