Author Guidelines

Articles submitted for publication in Cuestiones de Género must strictly adhere to the guidelines contained in the following sections. Manuscripts that do not comply will be rejected. Only original and unpublished works that have not been previously published and that have not been submitted to other journals will be accepted.

EDITORIAL LINE

Cuestiones de Género: de la igualdad y la diferencia (Gender Issues: On Equality and Difference ), is an annual, open-access academic publication created at the initiative of the Interdisciplinary Seminar on Women's Studies at the University of León.

It welcomes original and unpublished contributions in any of the official languages ​​of the European Union. All articles must include an abstract and keywords in English.

It is open to all research, scientific communication, or original works in the area of ​​feminist and women's studies. The journal aims to strengthen an academic and interdisciplinary space for inquiry, discussion, and debate on gender.

The journal is fundamentally a means of disseminating research and, in this regard, meets the criteria required for scientific journals. However, in a few publications, the "Guest Articles" section has been included, which includes introductory contributions from renowned authors to give the issue greater consistency.

Cuestiones de Género strives to achieve the highest possible quality in its publications, applying strict peer-review criteria.

We recommend the use of gender-neutral and inclusive language in texts submitted for publication.

We encourage authors to use a gender perspective at all stages of the research process. When appropriate, studies recommend considering the relevance of incorporating sex or gender as an analytical variable and establishing whether this has influenced the results obtained. Likewise, results are expected to mention differences between the sexes or those due to gender relations, or, conversely, the absence of differences.

In order to highlight the work of women and men, the full names of the people cited in the text, including their first names, should be included in the reference list.

JOURNAL FORMAT

Cuestiones de Género is an open-access publication and will not charge authors for publishing. Making research freely available to the public fosters greater global knowledge sharing, enhances the visibility of authorship and work, and facilitates early citation. Articles will be published online in HTML and PDF formats and will be made available to readers, without restrictions, immediately after online publication.

Types of contributions

a) Articles

If they include research, scientific communication, or original works submitted to the Special Issue, Open Forum, and About sections.

These are original and unpublished texts that follow the standard academic structure of scientific journals, consisting of the title, abstract, and keywords in Spanish and English; introduction, objectives; methodology; presentation of the results and discussion thereof; final conclusions; and bibliography.

Articles must have a minimum length of 5,000 words and a maximum of 10,000 words, including all sections and appendices. Articles that exceed this limit will not be accepted.

They must follow the presentation format available in the download template.

It is advisable not to overuse notes and, if essential, to use the fewest possible numbers, always placing them at the end of the document.

Final references must be presented in alphabetical order and must include the authors' first names.

When the reference has a DOI (Digital Object Identifier), it must be indicated at the end of the reference. Ensure that links to electronic references work correctly.

The individual sections that divide the text must be numbered and must be in bold lowercase type.

The Editorial Board may reject an article without initiating the external review process if it considers that it does not comply with the standards, does not fit the thematic profile of the journal, or is considered to be of insufficient quality.

PHASE 1: Initial Evaluation

These works will go through two review phases:

In this phase, the articles must meet certain minimum requirements:

- Be original and unpublished;

- The article structure must include the following minimum sections: introduction, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusion;

- The abstract must include the following aspects: objectives, methodology, results, and conclusion;

- In-text citations and bibliography must strictly comply with the journal's standards;

- The manuscript must pass Turnitin’s review (the results of the article's review by the program must not exceed a similarity of 20%).

PHASE 2: Double-blind external peer review

Manuscripts that pass the initial evaluation (pre-review) will be sent for external review using the usual "double-blind peer review" system. At least two specialists in the same field of knowledge as the work will be sent for external review.

The anonymity of the participants will be maintained at all times, both in the authorship of the manuscript and in the evaluation process.

The Editorial Board will analyze the evaluations and decide whether to approve or reject the article.

The author will be informed of the acceptance or rejection of their contribution within a maximum of 4 (four) months from the closing date of the call for papers.

b) Guest Articles

This includes papers submitted after being invited by the Coordinator of the issues of each journal.

The articles will be sent to the Guest Articles section.

These are original texts, covering subjects related to the monograph's theme, and must include the title, abstract, and keywords in Spanish and English. Citations in the text and the final bibliography must follow the Journal's guidelines.

Articles must have a minimum length of 5,000 words and a maximum of 10,000 words, including all sections and appendices.

They must follow the presentation format available in the downloadable template.

It is advisable not to overuse notes and, if essential, to use the fewest possible numbers, always placing them at the end of the document.

Final references must be presented in alphabetical order and must include the authors' first names.

When the reference has a DOI (Digital Object Identifier), it must be indicated at the end. Please ensure that the links to electronic references work correctly.

The individual sections that divide the text must be numbered and used in bold lowercase font.

Invited articles are not submitted for external, double-blind peer review. However, they will be reviewed by the Coordinator, Editorial Board, and Technical Reviewer, who will assess formatting issues, and the authors will be informed if they need to make changes to the text.

c) Reviews

These are texts that review books, films, or works related to feminist studies, women's studies, or gender issues.

Reviews must have a maximum length of 2,500 words, including tables, figures, notes, photos, and bibliographies. Only very brief documentary appendices will be accepted, and only in cases justified by the author. This justification must be approved by the Editorial Board.

Book Reviews must include the following information: Book title, authorship, location, publisher, year, reviewer's name, institutional affiliation or workplace, and email address.

Film Reviews must include the following information: Film title (in Spanish and the film's official language), director, producer, year of release, cast (main actors and actresses), and genre.

These submissions must follow the presentation format available in the downloadable template.

It is advisable not to overuse notes and, if necessary, to use as few as possible, always placing them at the end of the document.

Final references should be presented in alphabetical order and should include the authors' first names.

When the reference includes a DOI (Digital Object Identifier), it should be indicated at the end. Ensure that links to electronic references work correctly.

The individual sections that divide the text should be numbered and should be in bold lowercase type.

Submitted reviews will be reviewed by the Coordinator, Editorial Board, and the Technical Reviewer, who will assess issues of form and editorial policy. Authors will be informed if they require modifications to the text. The decision to publish reviews is made by the Coordinator of the issue, advised by the Editorial Board.

PERIODICITY

The journal Cuestiones de Género: de la igualdad y la Diferencia (Gender Questions: On Equality and Difference) is published annually. It was created in 2005 at the initiative of the Interdisciplinary Seminar on Women's Studies at the University of León and has been published continuously every June since then.

It is open to all research projects conducted in the area of ​​feminist and women's studies with the aim of strengthening an academic and interdisciplinary space for inquiry, discussion, and debate on gender.

Cuestiones de Género does not charge authors for processing or publishing an article.

- Initial editorial decision: 30 days from the end of the call for papers.

- External peer review process: 30 days.

- Submission of versions with suggested revisions: 7 days.

- Final acceptance/rejection notification: 15 days.

- Editing and pre-print: 30 days

REVIEW POLICY

Submitting original manuscripts to any of the journal's sections does not automatically guarantee their acceptance.

All submitted manuscripts are initially reviewed by members of the Editorial Board, who assess whether the content conforms to the journal's editorial policy, whether the work is structured in accordance with the criteria expressed for each section, and whether it complies with the guidelines for submission of original manuscripts and the citation and bibliography standards.

Articles from the Monograph, Open Tribune, and A Propósito that pass this initial review will undergo a second round of external evaluation, using a double-blind peer review system. If modifications are required, suggestions will be sent to the authors of the manuscripts for appropriate modifications.

The final decision on whether to publish manuscripts rests with the Editorial Board. Details of the journal's editorial process are available at this link.

PREPARATION OF MANUSCRIPTS

Articles must follow the submission format available in the downloadable template here.

Cuestiones de Género uses the anti-plagiarism software Turnitin as a plagiarism detection tool.

Accepted articles will be published in the Journal until the end of June. No changes can be made to the article after its online publication. The receipt and acceptance dates will appear at the beginning of each article.

Before submitting the article, the author should complete a checklist to determine if their manuscript complies with all the Journal's standards:

CHECKLIST BEFORE SUBMISSION
	The article is original and unpublished and has not been submitted to other journals.
	The article must have a minimum length of 5,000 words and a maximum of 10,000 words, including all sections and appendices.
	The title must not exceed 20 words.
	The abstract must not exceed 120 words.
	The abstract must include the following elements: introduction, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusion.
	Five (5) keywords have been included.
	The article must include the following elements: introduction, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusion.
	Sections and subsections are numbered in Arabic characters.
	Illustrations, graphs, tables, etc., are numbered in Arabic characters and must be accompanied by a title and a footnote, in which the source must be cited.
	The graphics are presented in editable format.
	Images are embedded in the document in JPG format and with a minimum resolution of 200 dpi.
	Notes are consecutively numbered in Arabic characters, superimposed over the text, and inserted in footnotes.
	In-text citations and bibliographic references strictly follow the Journal's Standards.
	The text uses inclusive, bias-free language, using terms that avoid stereotypes, in accordance with the Policy of Good Editorial Practices on Gender Equality.

 

SHIPPING FORMAT

Originals must be submitted following the Journal template in Microsoft Word format, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, 1.3 line spacing. Do not use capital letters.

The file containing the article text must be sent along with another file containing a brief resume (maximum 120 words) of the author(s), including full names and surnames, their corresponding email addresses, as well as acknowledgments and funding, if applicable.

Each work must include the following information on the first page:

Statement of Author Contribution

Author's Name:

Organization or Center. City. Country:

Contact Email:

ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx.

IMPORTANT: It is mandatory to include the ORCID identification number along with the author's affiliation. If you are not registered, you can register with ORCID free of charge at https://orcid.org/register.

This journal applies the CRediT taxonomy to research articles for identifying authorship contributions based on the assignment of specific roles. Please see our Authorship Identification Policy for more information. This information must be included in the document under the heading "Statement of Authorship Contribution."

Title. The title, in Spanish and English, must be explicit, clearly reflect the content of the work, and have a maximum length of 20 words.

Authorship. Full name(s) and surname(s) of the author(s); organization or center of work; country and email address(es).

Abstract. Articles must include an abstract of a maximum of 120 words in both Spanish and English, indicating the objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions of the work.

Keywords. A maximum of 7 keywords, in Spanish and English, not included in the title, must be included.

Text writing and presentation. The writing must be clear, concise, and inclusive. Notes will be accepted, provided they are the minimum necessary and placed at the end of the text. Texts must have a minimum length of 5,000 words and a maximum of 10,000 words, including all sections and annexes.

Tables, figures, and photographs. The number of tables, figures, and photographs should be limited to those that are truly representative. They should be numbered consecutively as they appear in the text, and each should have an explanatory title at the top and a caption at the bottom, indicating the source. If they are not original, the source must always be indicated.

Tables, figures, graphs, and photographs must be included in the text in their corresponding place. They must also all be sent in JPEG format, in a single ZIP or RAR compressed file. Photographs and figures must have a minimum resolution of 300 pixels per inch for publication. Graphs must be in editable format.

Formulas and/or mathematical expressions. They must be inserted into Word itself, but under no circumstances may they be incorporated as images.

Citations and References. In-text citations and references follow the Harvard format adapted for use in Spanish, and the full first name must be included instead of the initial.

At the end of the manuscript, after the conclusions and before the References, the following must be included:

Declaration of Use of Artificial Intelligence

If the author(s) used Artificial Intelligence in the development of their manuscript, the use of this tool must be indicated in accordance with the Journal's Artificial Intelligence Use Policy. Authors must explicitly declare the use of any AI tool in the writing or analysis of their manuscripts. The software used, the functions applied, and the sections of the manuscript where it was used must be specified.

Funding and Acknowledgments

If the manuscript has been funded, the source of funding for the research must be indicated; however, during the evaluation process, this information must be anonymized and included in the final version of the manuscript. Each author must individually declare all sources of funding received for the research submitted to the journal. This information includes the names of the funding agencies, the grant numbers, and a description of the role of each funder. If the funder did not play a role in the research, this should also be indicated. In the "acknowledgments" section of a submission to Cuestiones de Género, authors may acknowledge individuals whose contributions did not meet the criteria for authorship but significantly influenced the study.

HOW TO CIT WTHIN THE TEXT

Cuestiones de Género Journal uses the Harvard style for citations and bibliographic references. In Harvard style, the in-text citation is formatted as author-date, and the bibliographic references appear at the end of the document in the form of a list ordered by author and year of publication.

This format uses the author-date citation system between the text of the document (Indirect citation: Poncela, 2011; Direct citation: Blanco García, 2021: 23) and the bibliographic references at the end of the document in the form of a list ordered by author and year of publication.

Direct quotes:

This is when the exact words of another author or of a previously published document are transcribed. The transcribed text must be in quotation marks and the reference must include the author's surname, year and page number.

E.g.: (Artiles de León, 1995: 45). Or: Artiles de León (1995: 45). If they are quotes from newspapers: (El País, 28-11-2009: 50).

Quotes of up to 4 lines will be integrated into the text indicated by double quotation marks and quotes that exceed 4 lines will be presented in a paragraph separated from the text by a line, also in double quotation marks.

Indirect quotes:

This is when the idea of ​​another author is summarized but his/her words are not reproduced verbatim. The reference must include the author's surname and the year.

E.g.: Sexuality encompasses both biological and psychological and sociocultural characteristics (Artiles de León, 1995).

Some authors (Segura Dimaría, 2014; Feito García, 2008; Blango García, 2010) have criticized the idea that […]

Both in direct and indirect citations:

Up to 4 authors:

(Moore, Estrich, McGillis and Spelman, 1984)

More than 4 authors:

(Moore et al., 1984: 43)

To cite research found in another work:

Brown (1967), cited by Smith (1970: 27), discovered that…
It was found (Brown, 1967, cited by Smith, 1970: 28) that…

If there is no date “No date”:

Socrates (n.d.) wrote and demonstrated…

If it is an unidentified author “anonymous”:

Marketing Strategy (Anon, 1999)

If it is an oral source:

(López Díez, 30-06-2011)

If it is a printed newspaper:

(El País, 12-03-2012: 32)

If it is an online newspaper:

(El País, 12-03-2012)

HOW TO WTHIN FINAL REFERENCES

All references included in the Final Bibliography must be cited in the body of the text and vice versa.

Final references must be listed in alphabetical order and must include the authors' first names. When the reference is to an article with a DOI (Digital Object Identifier), this must always be indicated at the end of the reference. To check whether a bibliographic reference has a DOI or not, you can visit the following address (which allows individual or block searches): http://www.crossref.org/SimpleTextQuery.

Books:

Blanco, Ana Isabel (Coord.) (2002). New visions of motherhood. León: University of León.

Books (more than 4 authors):

Mohr, Laurence B. et al. (1996). Impact analysis for program evaluation. London: Sage.

When there is more than one work by the same author, cite the most recent work first:

Moragas, Miguel de (1993). Sociology of mass communication. Vol. II, Structure, functions and effects. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.

Moragas, Miguel de (Ed.) (1986). Sociology of mass communication. Vol. I, Schools and authors.  Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.

Moragas, Miguel de (1984). Theories of Communication. Research on media in America and Europe. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.

Works by the same author in the same year:

In the case of twin references, letters must be used after the years to distinguish the works.

Leoz, Daniele (2009a). Gender stereotypes on the covers of women's youth magazines. European Masters Thesis. University of León.

Leoz, Daniele (2009b). "Women's studies in Spanish universities. The case of the Interdisciplinary Seminar on Gender Studies at the University of León". In: Extensão em Foco, 4, Jul./Dec., pp. 63-74.

Articles in collective volume:

Cebrián, Inmaculada (2000). “Women and part-time work in Spain”. In: Paula Rodríguez Madroño and Carlos Román del Río (Eds.). Women in the labor market. Málaga. Institute of Regional Development, pp. 209-232.

Journal articles:

Miguélez Lobo, Fausto (1995). “Strategies and ideologies of flexibility”. In: Meanwhile, 2 (60), pp.71-83.

If there is a volume and number, the volume and the number always come first in parentheses.

Newspaper articles:

Pérez Royo, Javier (2010). “Equality cannot wait”. In: El País, April 16, no. 11,985, p. 23.

Anonymous articles:

Newspaper name (year). “article title”, date, no., page/s.

Mundo Obrero (1978). “Divorce bill”, June 18-24, (21), page/s.

The number in parentheses.

Digital newspaper articles:

Serra, Catalina (2011). “Arco, still a female issue”. In: El País, February 20. Available at: http://cultura.elpais.com/cultura/2011/02/20/actualidad/1298156401_850215.html [03/01/2012].

Digital articles:

Serra, Inmaculada (2011). “The female prostitution market. An approach from the Valencian case”. In: Revista Política y Sociedad, 48 (1), pp. 175-192. Available at: http://revistas.ucm.es/cps/11308001/articulos/POSO1111130175A.PDF [01-04-2011].

If there is a volume and number, always put the volume first and the number in parentheses.

Digital documents:

United Nations (2005). “Results on women and gender equality”. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/development/devagenda/gender.shtml [04-06-2011].

Websites:

Feminist Collections A Quarterly of Women’s Studies Resources. Available at: http://womenst.library.wisc.edu/fcmain.htm [05-09-2002].

Oral Sources:

López Díez, Pilar [Conference], Santander, 06-30-2011.

PREPARATION OF SUPPLEMENTARY FILES

Before submitting, you must have the following files, in addition to the article text:

Images and graphics in a single compressed file in ZIP or RAR format.

Supplementary files must be uploaded as separate components of the article.

MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION

Manuscripts will be submitted electronically through the Cuestiones de Género Journal Platform. Authors must register with a username and password. The journal will not accept manuscripts that do not adhere to the format and style guidelines stipulated in the current Guidelines for Authors, are submitted after the deadline established in the specific Calls for Papers, or are sent by mail.

Manuscripts submitted in a language other than Spanish must select the language of the original from the drop-down list when submitting. If the language is not selected at this time, the title will automatically appear in Spanish in the journal's index upon publication.

As Cuestiones de Género Journal is an annual journal, submissions will be received throughout the year. The closing date for each call is February 28th of each year, unless, exceptionally, it is postponed by 15 days. The Journal will acknowledge receipt of manuscripts within a maximum of 30 (thirty) days from the closing date of the call.

FIRST-STAGE EVALUATION

Once the articles have been received, they will be reviewed by the Coordinating Committee and the Editorial Board to determine their thematic relevance and compliance with the journal's established editorial standards. Failure to meet any of the aforementioned parameters, as well as the lack of any type of documentation or late submission, may result in the editors rejecting a manuscript in the first instance.

Please note that for initial acceptance, manuscripts must meet a series of minimum requirements, which are detailed below.

The essential requirements for passing the first review phase are:

- Articles must be unpublished, the result of research, scientific communication, or original creation.

- The article must be structured within the text body to include the following duly numbered sections: introduction, objectives, methodology, results and conclusion.

- The abstract must include the following aspects: objectives, methodology, results and conclusion.

- That the in-text citations and bibliography strictly comply with the journal's standards.

- That the manuscript passes Turnitin's analysis (the results of the article's review by the program must not exceed a similarity of 20%).

If the manuscript does not meet any of the aforementioned requirements, it will be rejected in the first instance.

If the Editorial Board considers that there are minor deficiencies and that the necessary changes are minor, they will give the author the opportunity to correct them and resubmit the revised manuscript within a maximum of two (2) days.

Articles that meet all the requirements will move on to the next phase. In any of the above cases, the Journal will send the author a communication regarding the editorial decisions.

EXTERNAL DOUBLE-BLIND PEER REVIEW

In order to ensure content quality, manuscripts belonging to the "Monograph," "Open Forum," and "About" sections that have passed formal review by the editors will be subject to double-blind peer review by external specialists, following the guidelines of the Double-Blind Peer Review System for the evaluation of scientific works. It should be noted that the development of this stage is necessarily conditioned by the response times of the multiple people involved.

The reviewers will be preselected by the editors, according to their scientific level and thematic affinity with the manuscript to be reviewed. The identity of the reviewers cannot be revealed to the authors, guaranteeing the absolute anonymity of the evaluation reports and opinions. In accordance with the recommendations of the Committee of Publication Ethics (COPE), reviews should be conducted based on the following criteria: scientific relevance, originality, clarity, and pertinence. Reviewers may suggest any modifications they consider significant and pertinent, related to the content, structure, objectives, methodology, results, interpretations, and/or bibliographic references. These modifications must:

a) Be based on the criteria defined in the corresponding evaluation form;

b) Be objective and respectful of dissent; and

c) Promote critical construction and exchange to guide and improve contributions.

The evaluation process will consist of a maximum of two (2) rounds of peer review. During the first round, manuscripts will be reviewed by two (2) reviewers who will have a period of 30 (thirty) days to complete the evaluation and submit their report.

At this stage, each reviewer's opinion may result in one of the following outcomes:

a) Accept the submission. The work must be published as is, without any improvements.

b) Publishable with modifications. The work can be published after making a series of changes that will help improve its content.

c) Resubmit for revision. The work must be modified with the proposed changes and then reviewed again by you.

d) Not publishable. The work is deficient in content and, therefore, does not meet the requirements for publication.

If there are significant discrepancies between the two opinions, the Editorial Committee will review the arguments offered by the specialists and may submit the manuscript for review by a third reviewer.

If the submissions receive favorable evaluations, the papers will be sent back to the authors so that they can make all the requested corrections or modifications within 7 (seven) days.

Once the relevant modifications have been made, the authors must submit the corrected manuscript along with a Disclaimer detailing each and every one of the changes made (both minor and major). If the authors disagree with any of the comments made by the reviewers, they must justify their position in said document. The Disclaimer will be delivered to the editors in a separate file and must be signed by each and every author. The corrected manuscript file must be returned with the change log so that the Editorial Board and reviewers can corroborate the minor and major modifications made.

Finally, if any of the reviewers requested major changes, the manuscript will be submitted to a second round of review to verify whether the comments made in the first round were considered. In this case, the final opinions can only be of two (2) types: Accepted or Rejected.

ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE MANUSCRIPT

The final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript will be the final decision of the Editorial Committee, and this is a final decision. The decision will be communicated to the authors within 15 (fifteen) days of receiving the final version of the manuscripts approved by the reviewers. Acceptance will be subject to the following criteria:

a) Obtaining two favorable evaluations;

b) Consideration of all corrections and/or suggestions made by reviewers and editors;

c) Compliance with editorial standards; and

d) Compliance with the deadlines established by the journal.

Once the Editorial Committee decides to accept a manuscript, it will proceed to the editing or editorial production stage. It may no longer be withdrawn by the authors, and no further changes may be made to the author's composition.

EDITORIAL PRODUCTION

During this stage, the Editorial Committee will handle the following tasks:

a) Copyediting;

b) Layout;

c) Proofreading;

d) Correcting the metadata of the final version.

The team will complete this process within 30 (thirty) days. Each process is described below.

a) Copyediting

The editorial team will review the text for spelling, grammatical, syntactical, and semantic errors, as well as the presence of filler words and the appropriate use of vocabulary specific to the discipline.

b) Layout

The formal layout of all content for the current issue will be completed. For an editorial publication to be attractive, it is important to maintain a balance between content and presentation, thus ensuring aesthetic and informational consistency. Consequently, this step involves the organization, distribution, and presentation of each of the textual and graphic elements that comprise each work.

c) Proofreading

After layout, galley proofs will be generated for each manuscript. These are preliminary versions of the works to be published, prepared to detect typographical and/or layout errors before final publication. These will be made available to the authors, who will have a maximum of two (2) days to review the manuscripts and submit their comments. At this stage, only formal and typographical errors may be corrected, but rewriting of the text or any other changes to the content of the manuscripts (including tables and figures) will not be permitted.

d) Correction of metadata for the final version

Metadata includes data that describe other data. These refer to the description of each manuscript's properties, facilitate interoperability through the application of standards and protocols shared with other systems, and offer broader contexts of meaning in search engines, facilitating efficient information retrieval. Thus, once the galley proofs have been corrected, the Editorial Committee will proceed to correct and unify all the metadata associated with the final version of each work.

PUBLICATION

The publication of Cuestiones de Género Journal is annual and has been carried out in June, without interruption, since its creation in 2005.

POLICIES APPLIED TO AUTHORSHIP

1. Authorship and Contribution Policy

2. Recommendations on Gender Perspective and the Use of Inclusive and Gender-Related Language

3. Inclusion of Gender and Sex in Research

4. Anti-Plagiarism Policy

5. Conflict of Interest

6. Research Misconduct Policy

7. Copyright

8. Funding and Acknowledgment Policy

9. Open Access Policy

10. Artificial Intelligence Policy

The full description of the policies applied to authorship can be found here.