What do we know about campaign finance and gender so far? The scoping review as an analysis tool with a feminist approach

Maria Cecília Eduardo; Juliana I. Luiz  Souza; Rodrigo Rossi Horochovski

doi:10.18002/cg.i18.7587

Autori

Maria Cecília Eduardo Federal University of Paraná – Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8115-9993
Juliana I. Luiz Souza Pompeu Fabra University – Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1361-3159
Rodrigo Rossi Horochovski Federal University of Paraná – Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1135-0543

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18002/cg.i18.7587

Parole chiave:

female political participation, feminist theories, campaign finance, scope review

Abstract

This paper aims to present the scoping review as an analysis tool for the feminist debate. Through the use of this bibliometric technique, we surveyed the academic production of two central themes of political science: campaign finance and female political participation. To understand what has the literature shown us so far, we produced a state of the art based on 51 articles found in two databases (Scopus and Web of Science). We could see that even with the increase in production on these themes, the male authorship status quo remains, and gender-related issues in political processes continue to be peripheral in the debate. This fact reinforces the need for a feminist perspective that looks at gender beyond an analysis variable.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Métricas alternativas

Biografie autore

Maria Cecília Eduardo, Federal University of Paraná – Brazil

Postdoctoral researcher at the National Institutes of Science and Technology Program (INCT), in the area of Representation and democratic legitimacy, at the Department of Political Sciences of Federal University of Paraná (UFPR). She holds a PhD in Political Science from the UFPR, and is a volunteer researcher at the Analysis of Political Parties and Systems Partisans Laboratory (Laboratório de Análise dos Partidos Políticos e Sistemas Partidários - LAPeS) and at the Analysis of the Scientific Field Laboratory (Laboratório de Análise do Campo Científico – LACC) at the UFPR. Her research interests are campaign finance, gender and democracy, feminist studies, and scoping review.

Juliana I. Luiz Souza, Pompeu Fabra University – Spain

Postdoctoral researcher in the INTERMAPS project at the Department of Political and Social Sciences of Pompeu Fabra University. She holds a PhD in Political Science from the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR) and is a volunteer researcher at the Mediacultures, power and society Research Group at the UFPR and at the Group of Interdisciplinary Studies in Social Sciences (Grupo de Estudos Interdisciplinares em Ciências Sociais – GEICS) of the University of Minho. Her research interests are gender and sexual diversity policies, inequalities, and discursive disputes in the media, parliament and education.

Rodrigo Rossi Horochovski, Federal University of Paraná – Brazil

Professor of Public Administration and Political Science at the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), where coordinates the Scientific Field Analysis Laboratory (Laboratório de Análise do Campo Científico – LACC). His research interests are political finance, social network analysis (SNA), and scientometrics.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Abrizah, Abdullah et al. (2013): “Lis Journals scientific impact and subject categorization: A comparison between Web of Science and Scopus”. In: Scientometrics, vol. 94, pp. 721-740.

Araújo, Clara (1999): Cidadania Incompleta: o Impacto da Lei de Cotas sobre a Representação Política das Mulheres no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro.Tese de Doutorado em Sociologia e Antropologia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

Araújo, Ronaldo Ferreira and Alvarenga, Lidia (2011): “A bibliometria na pesquisa científica da pós-graduação brasileira de 1987 a 2007”. In: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, vol. 16, nº. 31, pp. 51-70.

Arksey, Hilary y O’Malley, Lisa (2005): “Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework”. In: International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 8, nº. 1, pp. 19-32.

Atmor, Nir; Harsgor, Liran and Kening, Ofer (2022): “Campaign expenditures and electoral outcomes in Israeli legislative primaries – A financial gender gap? In: International Political Science Review, pp. 1-16.

Babbie, Earl (2003): Métodos de Pesquisa de Survey. Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG.

Ballington, Julie; Kahane, Muriel (2014): “Women in Politics: Financing for Gender Equality”. In: Elin Falguera, Samuel Jones and Magnus Ohman (eds.): Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns. Sweden: International IDEA.

Barber, Michael; Butler, Daniel M. y Preece, Jessica (2016): “Gender Inequalities in Campaign Finance”. In: Quarterly Journal of Political Science, vol. 11, pp. 219-248.

Codato, Adriano; Horochovski, Rodrigo R. y Massimo, Lucas (2017): “A colaboração na Ciência Política brasileira: um estudo exploratório do padrão de coautorias em periódicos nacionais”. In: 9º Congreso Latinoamericano de Ciencia Política da Asociación Latinoamericana de Ciencia Política (ALACIP). Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13955.20001 [01/02/2023].

Dacombe, Rod (2018): “Systematic Reviews in Political Science: What Can the Approach Contribute to Political Research?” In: Political Studies Review, vol. 16, nº. 2, pp. 148-157.

Dahl, Robert (2009): Sobre a democracia. Brasília: Editora UnB.

Feo, Francesca; Fiorelli, Chiara and Piccio, Daniela R (2021): “Gendered patterns in candidates’ campaign fundraising: The case of Italy”. In: International Political Science Review, pp. 1-16.

Ferrari, Rossella (2015): “Writing narrative style literature reviews”. In: Medical Writing, vol. 24, nº. 4, pp. 230-235.

Fraser, Nancy (1992): “Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy”. In: Craig Calhoun (ed.): Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 109-142.

Goertz, Gary and Mazur, Amy G. (2008) (eds.): Politics, Gender, and Concepts: Theory and Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gonçalves, Ricardo Dantas (2021): Geografia eleitoral: tendências e indicações para o desenvolvimento da Ciência Política. Curitiba. Tese de Doutorado em Ciência Política da Universidade Federal do Paraná.

Hogan, Robert E. (2010): “Candidate Gender and Voter Support in State Legislative Elections”. In: Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, vol. 31, pp. 44-66.

Hogan, Robert E. (2007): “The effects of candidate gender on campaign spending in state legislative elections”. In: Social Science Quarterly, vol. 88, nº. 5, pp. 1092-1105.

Inglehart, Ronald F. y Norris, Pippa (2016): Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. Philadelphia: Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (APSA).

King, Gary (1995): “Replication, replication”. In: PS: Political Science and Politics, vol. 28, nº. 3, pp. 444-452.

Leite, Fernando (2016): Ciência Política: da antiguidade aos dias de hoje. Curitiba: InterSaberes.

Lenine, Enzo and Mörschbächer, Melina (2020): “Pesquisa bibliométrica e hierarquias do conhecimento em Ciência Política”. In: Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, nº. 31, pp. 123-160.

Lijphart, Arend (1999): Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Lima, Enzo; Mörschbächer, Melina and Peres, Paulo (2018): “Three decades of the International Political Science Review (IPSR): A map of the methodological preferences in IPSR articles”. In: International Political Science Review, vol. 39, nº. 5, pp. 679-689.

Mansbridge, Jane (1999): “Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’”. In: Journal of Politics, vol. 61, nº. 3, pp. 628-657.

Matos, Marlise (2016): “A institucionalização acadêmica dos estudos de gênero e feministas na ciência política brasileira”. In: Leonardo Avritzer, Carlos Milani and Maria D. S. Braga: A Ciência Política no Brasil: 1960-2015. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.

Mörschbächer, Melina (2018): A ciência e a política da ciência: pluralismo intelectual e diversidade profissional na ciência política norte-americana. Tese de Doutorado em Ciência Política da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre.

Munn, Zachary et al. (2018): “Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach”. In: BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 18, nº. 1, pp. 1-7.

Murray, Rainbow (2021): “It’s a rich man’s world: How class and glass ceilings intersect for UK parliamentary candidates”. In: International Political Science Review, pp. 1-14.

Murray, Rainbow; Muriaas, Ragnhild L. and Wang, Vibeke (2021): “Editorial introduction: Gender and political financing”. In: International Political Science Review, pp. 1-10, 2021.

Nicolau, Jairo and Oliveira, Lilian (2017): “Political Science in Brazil: an analysis of academic articles (1966-2015)”. In: Sociologia & Antropologia, vol. 7, nº. 2, pp. 371-393.

Oliveira, Otávio José de et al. (2019): “Bibliometric Method for Mapping the State-of-the Art and Identifying Research Gaps and Trends in Literature: An Essential Instrument to Support the Development of Scientific Projects”. In: Suad Kunosic and Enver Zerem (eds.): Scientometrics Recent Advances. London: IntechOpen, pp. 47-66.

Packer, Abel L. et al. (1998): “SciELO: uma metodologia para publicação eletrônica”. In: Ciência da Informação, vol. 27, nº. 2, pp. 109-121.

Pateman, Carole (1993): O contrato sexual. São Paulo: Editora Paz e Terra.

Phillips, Anne (1999): Which Equalities Matter? Cambridge: Polity Press.

Przeworski, Adam (1994): Democracia e mercado no Leste Europeu e na América Latina. Rio de Janeiro: Relume-Dumará.

Rezende, Daniela L. and Elias, Maria Ligia G. G. R (2021): “O feminismo mudou a ciência política brasileira? Uma reflexão sobre os estudos feministas e de gênero na produção acadêmica recente”. In: Mariana Batista, Ednaldo Ribeiro and Rogério Arantes: As teorias e o caso. Santo André: EdUFABC, pp. 383-416.

Ruf, Florian (2021): “Does Non-Quota Strategy Matter? A Comparative Study on Candidate Selection and Women’s Representation at the Local Level in Germany”. In: Politics & Gender, vol. 17, nº. 1, pp. 74-103.

Sacchet, Teresa and Speck, Bruno W. (2012): “Financiamento Eleitoral, Representação Política e Gênero: uma análise das eleições de 2006”. In: Opinião Pública, vol. 18, pp. 177-197.

Saks, Flavia do Canto (2005): Busca Booleana: Teoria e Prática. Monografia de Graduação em Gestão da Informação da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba.

Sampaio, Daniel and Figueiredo Filho, Dalson B (2019): “Como o dinheiro influencia as eleições municipais no Brasil: uma revisão sistemática”. In: BIB, nº. 88, pp. 1-25.

Sanchez, Beatriz R. (2017): Teoria política feminista e representação substantiva: uma análise da bancada feminina da Câmara dos Deputados. Tese de Doutorado em Ciência Política da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.

Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (2014): Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

Scielo, Scientific Electronic Library Online. SciELO Brasil. Retrieved in: https://www.scielo.br [04/02/2022].

Shin, Ki-young and Kwon, Soo Hyun (2022): “‘Above all, it will boil down to money problems’: The impact of gender-targeted public financing on political parties and women candidates in South Korea”. In: International Political Science Review, pp. 1-16.

Snyder, Hannah (2019): “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines”. In: Journal of Business Research, vol. 104, pp. 333-339.

Vidal, Camila F (2021): “Polarização política e partidária nos Estados Unidos (1936-2016)”. In: Opinião Pública, vol. 27, nº. 2, pp. 412-450.

Zovatto, Daniel (2005): “Financiamento dos partidos e campanhas eleitorais na América Latina: uma análise comparada”. In: Opinião Pública, vol. 11, nº. 2, pp. 287- 336.